澳洲人类学论文代写:怀疑论者

澳洲人类学论文代写:怀疑论者

怀疑论者,另一方面不同意全球化的理论,“民族国家的终结”。赫斯特和汤普森,国家在很大程度上仍控制,事实上,他们有最大的权力,没有所谓的“全球化”这个词,因此,这一概念有一个全球化对国家的影响没有意义(赫斯特和汤普森,1999:p256 – 280)在这篇文章中,高度全球化和复杂的全球化支持者被归类为自由主义者或全球主义者当他们接受全球化的概念,认为在减少国家的权力,把世界看成是“全球治理和概念化全球化作为人类行为的框架的重新排序”(et al,1999:p10)。他们认为全球化正在通过技术扩散产生。

怀疑论者被归类为现实主义者认为这个词不应该“全球化,而是国际化和区域化”(et al,1999:p10)这“国际化取决于国家的默许和支持”(et al,1999:p10)

澳洲人类学论文代写:怀疑论者

The Sceptics, on the other hand disagree with the theories of the globalists that see the “end of nation states”. For Hirst and Thompson, The nation states are still very much in control, in fact, they have the most power and there is no such thing as the word “globalisation”, therefore, the notion that there is an effect of globalisation on nation states does not make sense (Hirst and Thompson, 1999: p256-280)In this essay, the hyper globalists and the complex globalists are classified as the liberalists or the globalists as they accept the concept of globalisation, believe in the reduction of the nation state’s powers, view the world as “being governed globally and conceptualise globalisation as a reordering of the frame work of human action” (Held et al, 1999: p10). They believe that globalisation is being spread through the technologies arising everyday.
The Sceptics are classified as the realists who believe that the word should not be “globalisation, rather it is internationalisation and regionalisation” (Held et al, 1999: p10) and this “internationalisation depends on state’s acquiescence and support” (Held et al, 1999: p10)

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注